EVAG on Facebook
Remember to click on the 'Like' button!

Home‎ > ‎

INDIVIDUAL/ MULTIPLE TURBINES


There are, at present, applications for fourteen wind turbines along the Carse (the road West out of Stirling) and its environs thus leading to a dispersed wind farm along the Carse of Stirling.

Most of the applications have been submitted by the renewable energy arm of Intelligent Land Investments (ILI), a Hamilton based company. This is what they say on their website:

Presently ILI RE is working alongside set government strategies to push the growth for single rural turbines within the feed in tariff. This is an opportunity like no other for landowners to benefit from a government set subsidy for the next 20yrs.


The height of most of these turbines is 250 ft (76m), not far short of the height of the turbines at the Braes of Doune.

Do we want the Carse to become the playground of wind developers, at enormous cost to the area in terms of amenity and tourism particularly?

Stirling Council has strongly requested proper supporting information on most of these applications. Although thestatutory period has passed, the Council is still accepting objections, either by letter or online.

How to Object

Each member of a household must object separately, either by letter or online at http://www.stirling.gov.uk/index/services/planning/planpub.htm
 
Go to Planning; Application Search; key in the pertinent application number; click Search; Press 'Click to view'.

Persons under 16 can object, provided that they are old enough to understand what they are objecting to, although their letters can be dictated to, and written by, a parent. Although Stirling Council will accept one letter referring to the multiplicity of applications, each application number must be given in the title. Objections can be made by anybody, anywhere, who wants to object but more weight is given to those more immediately impacted upon.

If objecting, comments must be on material planning grounds, such as:
  • Landscape impact
  • Visual Impact
  • Environmental Impact
  • Noise and Disturbance

The address to write to is:

Stirling Council Environment Services
Planning & Regulation
Viewforth
Stirling FK8 2ET

For the attention of Mrs Jane Brooks-Burnett who is the Case Officer responsible for most of the applications.

Note: One can write on the letter ‘I reserve the right to add to or amend my comments’ so that further objections can be raised when the supporting documentation is received by the Council.

Details of the applications

 Location  Turbine details  Application Nos.
 Kepculloch Farm,  Balfron/Buchlyvie  Single 76m  11/00214/FUL
 Gowstone Farm, Buchlyvie  Single 76m  11/00208/FUL
 Gribloch Farm, Kippen  Single 76m  11/00206/FUL    
 Cuptree Farm, Thornhill  Twin 45m  11/00050/FUL
 Murdieston, Thornhill  Twin 45m  11/00056/FUL
 Ballinton, Thornhill  Single 76m  11/00155/FUL
 Mackeanston House, Doune  Single 76m  11/00307/FUL
 Munnieston, Thornhill  Single 76m  11/00207/FUL
 Braes of Boquhapple, Thornhill
 4 Single
 73m
 11/00120/FUL
 11/00162/FUL
 11/00163/FUL
 11/00164/FUL

Here is a sample letter, in brief form, which should be broadened or amended to cover those areas which concern you most.


Dear Mrs Brooks-Burnett,

Application Nos:…………………………………………………………………………

I am writing with regard to the above multiple applications and my letter below relates to each application.

I object strongly to this application.

It is an unsuitable location; in an undulating landscape, turbines of this height will dominate the immediate area.

Taken in conjunction with other applications for single and multiple turbines, and with existing windfarms in the locale, the cumulative impact will be enormous, to the detriment of amenity of residents and of the tourism industry.  Preservation of the Stirlingshire landscape, in its own right and as the gateway to Loch Lomond and The Trossachs, is vital. 

I reserve the right to add to, or modify, this objection should the need arise.

Yours sincerely,

 

******

 

NOT SO INTELLIGENT, ILI


Good News


EVAG has learned that ILI have withdrawn applications for wind turbines at Kepculloch, Gowstone, Gribloch, Ballinton, Murdieston and Cuptree. They have left the applications intact at Mackeanston and Munnieston, which are near to the proposed site of the Boquhapple applications.

The Boquhapple applications will be determined by the Planning Panel through the Public Hearing procedure at Stirling Council Chambers, Old Viewforth, on Monday 17th October at 11.15 a.m. 

EVAG will be in attendance to support the Thornhill Group who will represent the objectors and give a co-ordinated and comprehensive presentation to the Panel.

We should like to thank everybody who wrote letters of objection; the number received by the Council was a huge achievement at a holiday time of year and shows the depth of concern about the ruination of the West Stirlingshire landscape, and the impacts on local communities.


The Sunday Times, Sunday 19 June

Farmers Harvest Turbine Windfall

Carse of Stirling Wind Generator PDF

Detail:Carse of Stirling Wind Generator Map









Stirling Observer 19-08-11: Windfall or ill wind for Thornhill?

Tim Reid Response: 
Dear Editor
I am concerned that Thornhill residents have been misled.
Your article recently referred to the proposed Boquhapple wind turbine scheme being “a venture that could provide locals with lower electricity bills for up to 25 years”.
The Thornhill Community Trust were quick to distance themselves from this comment but it is quoted  directly from the press release issued by the developer EML Group Limited – who have so far declined to comment.
Clearly it suits the developer’s interest to have these unsubstantiated comments in the press at a time when they need support for a scheme that will enrich them substantially.
On the subject of village support, the developer’s press release and your subsequent article is written to suggest that the Boquhapple scheme has full village support which is not true.
Thornhill Community Trust has pledged to hold a community ballot, if planning permission is granted, and that this ballot will determine whether or not the scheme is formally adopted.
The whole wind turbine issue is divisive enough without misleading information being published.
Yours etc.
TIM REID
DOUNE