Located to the North East of Drymen, immediately adjacent to the Trossachs & Loch Lomond National Park, this wind farm proposal, previously entitled ‘Craigievern, has been given the name ‘Ard-Ghaoth’ by Banks Renewables. There is no place of that name in the vicinity, therefore we will refer to Craigievern (Ard-Ghaoth).
The proposal is for up to *twenty turbines at 328ft (100m).
*STOP PRESS 15-12-11
BANKS RENEWABLES, AT A PRESENTATION ON THURSDAY 15-12-11, STATED THAT THEIR FINAL DESIGN COMPRISES TEN 115M TURBINES. 377 FEET HIGH!!! THEY STATED THAT THEY HAVE LISTENED TO THE COMMUNITIES AND HAVE INCREASED THE HEIGHT TO LESSEN THE VISUAL IMPACT.
The proposal is for up to *twenty turbines at 328ft (100m).
*STOP PRESS 15-12-11
BANKS RENEWABLES, AT A PRESENTATION ON THURSDAY 15-12-11, STATED THAT THEIR FINAL DESIGN COMPRISES TEN 115M TURBINES. 377 FEET HIGH!!! THEY STATED THAT THEY HAVE LISTENED TO THE COMMUNITIES AND HAVE INCREASED THE HEIGHT TO LESSEN THE VISUAL IMPACT.
The ground is high at the location – 750ft (230m) above sea level at Bat a’ Charchel, and therefore the Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) highlights a huge impact on a wide area. Banks’ imagery shows that impact from Drymen; Thornhill; Killearn; Croftamie; Gartocharn; Buchlyvie; Balfron; Douchlage; Ben Lomond; Ben Ledi; Conic Hill; Duncryne Hill; Queens View; the West Highland Way, and Loch Lomond itself. Banks held an exhibition in Drymen on 20, 21 and 22 June, a few days after their brochure was delivered to some villages. It was not, however, given to conterminous neighbours, some of whom are only 1KM from the nearest proposed turbines, or to other villages’ residents. Banks lodged an application for a 60m high anemometer (wind monitoring mast) and a Scoping Report with Stirling Council on 8 July 2011. People who attended the exhibition came away variously with the impression that the proposal is a ‘done deal’; that Stirling Council has purposefully delineated that area as capable of supporting a wind farm; that the application would be submitted within weeks. Banks’ personnel do not appear to have been adept at putting over the due processes which must be undergone, and we address the above points here: The proposal is not a ‘done deal’. The Scoping Report will be followed by Stirling Council’s response, which will state in detail that which it and other bodies require to be contained in the Environmental Statement. An Environmental Statement is then prepared, and this will be a lengthy document. It will be made publicly available and the application details will be announced. At that time there is a statutory period in which objections can be made, although we would hope that, as with Ballindalloch Muir, the period would be extended. With regard to Stirling Council purposefully delineating the area, this is a distortion. In March 2011 the Council adopted Planning Policies & Guidance on renewable energy (wind turbine) developments into its Supplementary Planning Guidance, pending inclusion in the new Local Development Plan. The SPG states that the capacity of the area to support turbines over 50m is severely limited and then only if: • they are appropriate in scale, design and layout for their location • the landscape character and scale is capable of accommodating the scale of development proposed • landscape, wildlife and habitats of international and national importance are not significantly adversely impacted • historic heritage of national importance is not significantly adversely impacted • construction and operation will not impact adversely on the water environment (including water supply catchments) • aviation and telecommunication interests can be protected • significant detrimental effects upon nearby residential areas can be avoided And yet Banks have publicised a proposal, and submitted a Scoping Report, for turbines at twice that height, impacting hugely on an area famed for its natural beauty. NO THANKS, BANKS |
EVAG 